Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot

images anne hathaway and jake Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal Anne Hathaway
  • Jake Gyllenhaal Anne Hathaway



  • getta05
    03-27 04:20 PM
    So what do I do.
    I am looking to buy a SUBWAY franchise outright costing 200 K





    wallpaper Jake Gyllenhaal Anne Hathaway Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne
  • Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne



  • sdrblr
    09-04 01:39 PM
    We received "Welcome email" no CPO email





    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. AH on VogueAnne Hathaway looks
  • AH on VogueAnne Hathaway looks



  • TeddyKoochu
    12-28 10:58 AM
    I don't have the I-797A's I-94 which was attached to the bottom since I had to submit that in Jan 2009 when I'd visited India and come back to the US with H1-B stamping. I do have a copy of this I-797A's I-94...would giving this copy be better than not providing any at all? Thanks, Vick

    You are actually expected to provide the latest I94, I believe that your employer may have filed an I9 based on your latest I94, just find the I94 # and the local customs and immigration at the airport should be able to issue you a new one. If you have a copy or the number of this one it would help.





    2011 Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Anne Hathaway and Jake
  • Anne Hathaway and Jake



  • s416504
    02-24 03:05 PM
    I think best thing to apply your GC as soon as possible. You are running out of time if you need to move to Employer B. For GC, you don't have to join B. If A can apply EB1 then very good but make sure it's big company. My EB1 denied because small orgnisation & then I applied my EB3 thru diff employer.



    more...


    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne
  • Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne



  • ivorycard
    02-06 02:28 PM
    I will be promoted shortly as a Manager. My GC was applied as Programmer Analyst for the same company. When contacted the company attorney informed that it is not a problem, since 6 Months has been completed.





    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne
  • Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne



  • akilaakka
    07-23 06:29 PM
    If-485 is rejected should we wait till PD becomes current?



    more...


    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal who stripped
  • Jake Gyllenhaal who stripped



  • jay75
    06-17 03:20 PM
    Employer A:
    -Currently on their H1 (6th year fag end) and with an ongoing 485 proces 180 days passed.
    -Employer A is threatening to withdraw the I 140 if I move out from their company.

    Employer B:
    -Fortune Client where am currently working as a contractor
    -B is filing my H1 and would be offering me to use H1 or AC 21 to port to their company.

    I am transferring to company B upon H1 extension approval and then later use AC 21 when ever required.

    However, before I use AC 21, if the I 140 is revoked, am I still eligible to use AC 21?

    Does revoking I 140 by the employer after I 140 approval has any effect if I dont use AC 21 prior to revoking?

    If you have your 140 approved, then if Emp A withdraws may not cause any damage, but if your 140 is not approved and if Emp A withdraws it, certainly cause a big damage.





    2010 AH on VogueAnne Hathaway looks Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. anne hathaway and jake
  • anne hathaway and jake



  • english_august
    07-09 08:18 PM
    Guys - you can surely spend a couple of hours. And as a bonus, you might even see yourself on the evening news :D.

    It's not often that we get to talk to so many media organizations at the same place - this is really a golden opportunity, please don't let it go by.



    more...


    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Anne Hathaway and Jake
  • Anne Hathaway and Jake



  • mpsamant
    07-24 06:32 PM
    Dear IV:
    As per the USCIS FAQ memo there is some confusion on Q.12:

    Q12: Will USCIS accept concurrently filed I-140s/I-485s filed after July 31 when a labor certification is not required (i.e. priority date is established on or after August 1)?
    A12. USCIS will accept properly filed Forms I-140 filed on behalf of aliens with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007; however, pursuant to August Visa Bulletin No. 109, USCIS will reject any concurrently filed adjustment of status applications filed by aliens with a priority on or after August 1, 2007.

    Case:
    Category EB-2 (NIW) or EB-1 (OR) from California

    1) Will apply for I-140 electronically before July 31, 2007?
    DO we have option to choose Texas or Nebraska in e-filling

    2) DO we need to send I-485, EAD, Travel documents before August 17 or is it before July 31?

    3) Is this statement correct ? Supporting documents can be mailed within 30 or 35 days after e-filling. It can be sent as a different packet (i.e. need not be sent along with I-485, EAD, and travel document)

    Thanks for the help,
    regards
    Manoj





    hair Anne Hathaway and Jake Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. James White Photoshoot
  • James White Photoshoot



  • jthomas
    03-27 09:45 PM
    May I ask, where did you get this (incorrect) info from? Do you know that one can file only I-485 that is linked to I-130 as well as I-140. Read I-485 form.


    ________________
    Not a legal advice.

    from the immigration officer. they have to combine both the cases and then have one process the green card. Normally spouse married to US citizen gets green card within 5 months. The green card interview happens approx 3 months after filing I130. If the case is okay the papers are kept in a green file and have to wait till the employment based I-140, I485 will be combined and then they would get their green card. If there is anything missing or any questions, it would delay fuurther. Secondly The A number remains the same in both the application.
    The bad part, the candidate has to wait because he was in H1B for a long time.



    more...


    Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne
  • Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne



  • gc_buddy
    11-19 01:17 PM
    Thanks everyone for the valuable inputs..





    hot Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne
  • Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne



  • desi485
    01-08 01:20 PM
    If you have the case no. go to online case status and take the print out of approved notice, that should serve you purpose hopefully if you don�t have a original copy

    I do have case number for I-140

    I also took printout of online approval status using the case status number.

    But what about labor cert?

    I have no idea what was filed for me? job description or salary req.???

    All this time I was thinking I am ready for AC21 if needed, but if above is true, I am in trouble. (so many others have same issue)

    why we need photocopies? WHY USCIS expects us to have those? They are considered employer documents and most established employers do not share them with employees?

    Any one has any idea? Any links? Any official link which states that we do need to have photocopies?



    more...


    house View 10 Photos › Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Anne Hathaway Jake Gyllenhaal
  • Anne Hathaway Jake Gyllenhaal



  • mmanurker
    10-06 04:32 PM
    We(My wife and I) recently (July 2009) got our FPs done. immediately after that our cases got transferred from TSC to VSC.

    PD: Feb 14, 2005.

    I thought VSC is not processing any I-485 applications. Is anyone else in the same status ?

    Also, I have to apply for EAD and AP.. Do I apply in TSC or VSC ?:confused:

    Please help! :(

    yes, this happened with me as well...In last 10 days I have regular updates on my 485

    Initially filed at TSC--->Transferred to VSC then back to TSC and then again to Nebraska and today they transferred to a USCIS office(i guess it means to a local office, Now I am guessing they might ask me to appear in-person at their local office.)..very strange. as u can see I am in EB3 and my 140 is also not approved...





    tattoo Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Gyllenhaal, 29, and Hathaway,
  • Gyllenhaal, 29, and Hathaway,



  • baburob2
    10-08 01:48 AM
    thx.



    more...


    pictures Jake Gyllenhaal who stripped Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Anne Hathaway Scandal: Scandal
  • Anne Hathaway Scandal: Scandal



  • ursosweet
    02-06 09:35 AM
    I have been following this ongoing decision closely. I feel that going on EAD offers no disadvantage when compared with h1b extension (once 140 is approved and 6 months have passed).

    just like h1b you can stay on top to get it renewed every year. Unless one is a bachelor and plans to get the spouse on h4, chamging to EAD doesn't cause any harm. I know a lot of friends who have been on EAD for several years now and have not had a single problem. Th only risk is that if the 485 is rejected, then you have no shelter. But that chance is soooooooo little and i think the 485 rejection only occurs if one is considered to have broken a law, commited a felony or has been in any legal problems.

    I am on h1 andhave 2 years and am planning to go on EAD- atleast i can save those 2 years and if some thing happens with my 485, i think i can get h1 sponsored. I don't think so its a one way street (h1 to EAD).

    good luck.





    dresses Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. Links: Anne Hathaway • Jake
  • Links: Anne Hathaway • Jake



  • EndlessWait
    12-16 11:26 PM
    What a lousy and pathetic system it is , the so called USCIS. I mean they want ppl to wait for a decade to follow all the rules legally to get GC.

    And so is the congress/senate. It seems they are bent upon not giving GC, just dragging it from one recession to the other. :mad:



    more...


    makeup Anne Hathaway and Jake Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. View 10 Photos ›
  • View 10 Photos ›



  • Sachin_Stock
    02-04 08:23 PM
    My question was VERY specific. And I am not in a mood to discuss the trivial information that the responder threw up. It irks me when someone starts giving unsolicited advices instead of answering the question that I had asked.

    I am sorry, didn't mean to derail the topic, but my stand was clear.





    girlfriend Gyllenhaal, 29, and Hathaway, Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. #anne hathaway.
  • #anne hathaway.



  • logiclife
    07-31 09:59 PM
    I got a bunch that has photocopies from my lawyer of everything that went out to USCIS. 485, EAD, AP for myself and my wife.

    Everything is ok, except that there is an extra copy of G 28 each for myself and my wife and these extra copies are not signed by attorneys.

    In the middle of the package, right above the 485 forms, there are G28 forms that are properly signed. Everywhere else there is signatures where needed. But at the bottom of the bunch, there is extra G28 for each one of us that is missing signature from the attorney.

    Could this be a problem? Also, where is the URL for USCIS FAQ that states under what conditions that petitions can boomerang back to us?





    hairstyles Jake Gyllenhaal amp; Anne Anne Hathaway And Jake Gyllenhaal Photoshoot. jake gyllenhaal anne hathaway
  • jake gyllenhaal anne hathaway



  • vinzen
    08-14 10:55 PM
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplay.do

    NSC - I485 - Sep 15 2007
    TSC - I485 - Aug 30 2007

    Cheers,
    Ardnahc

    Hello guys ,

    New member here. I have been watching the forums occassionally. My PD is June 2002 EB3 and here is my situation from USCIS case status:

    1. I first applied for I765 and I485 on 08/10/2007 and got EAD for 1 year. According to https://egov.uscis.gov my status was "APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION".
    2. Then I by myself applied for renewal of EAD exactly after 1 year on 08/19/2008 and got EAD approved for 3 years. According to https://egov.uscis.gov, the form that I applied for was I765 and status again was "APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION".

    These were the only two entries on my status on https://egov.uscis.gov. So far so good.

    3. I decided to log on to this site this morning to check my status and saw a third entry in my case. It says the form number is I485 and they receieved it on 04/20/2009 and the case status is "APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS".
    I didnt do anything on 04/20/2009. So it seems like the I485 that I submitted along with I765 on 08/10/2007 was finally receieved by USCIS on 04/20/2009?. When I click on my case number, it says "On July 6, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice describing how we will process your case." and that it is with Texas Service Center. I checked TSC timings and looks like they are at 08/30/2007. Is this the date they first receieved my application (July 6, 2007) or the last update date (04/20/2009 .... look at #3 above). If it is the latter, I am still three years behind. If it is the first application date, then I have some hopes.

    Sorry for the long post and to make you read all this. Any help will be appreciated.

    thanks,





    Rolling_Flood
    09-24 01:14 AM
    lazycis,
    Thanks.

    Was your answer regarding your case, or other case(s) that you may know about?

    Related question, did you (or the other people) face considerable hassles for their I-485 approval(s)?


    "Yes" to both questions.





    logiclife
    07-31 09:59 PM
    I got a bunch that has photocopies from my lawyer of everything that went out to USCIS. 485, EAD, AP for myself and my wife.

    Everything is ok, except that there is an extra copy of G 28 each for myself and my wife and these extra copies are not signed by attorneys.

    In the middle of the package, right above the 485 forms, there are G28 forms that are properly signed. Everywhere else there is signatures where needed. But at the bottom of the bunch, there is extra G28 for each one of us that is missing signature from the attorney.

    Could this be a problem? Also, where is the URL for USCIS FAQ that states under what conditions that petitions can boomerang back to us?



    Blog Archive